Tensions between India and Pakistan burned the world of sports on Sunday when Indian cricket team refused to accept the Asian Cup trophy after beating their neighbors with five wickets in the final in Dubai.
The match was the third contest of rivals in the tournament four months after India fought a brief but intense air war caused by a deadly attack on tourists in Pahargam, managed Kashmir.
Why did India refuse to take the trophy?
India refused to take the trophy as it was presented by Mohsin Naqvi, president of the Asian Cricket Council (ACC) and chairman of the Pakistan Cricket Committee (PCB).
Naqvi is also Pakistan’s federal home minister.
“We have decided not to acquire the Asian Cup Trophy from the ACC Chair, which happens to be one of Pakistan’s major (political) leaders,” Devajit Saikia, chairman of India’s Cricket Management Committee (BCCI), told India’s ANI News Agency.
“That doesn’t mean that gentlemen will take the trophy along with the medals, so it’s very unfortunate and I hope that the trophies and medals will be returned to India as soon as possible.”
What happened in the India-Pakistan Asian Cup match?
The game ended around 10:30pm (18:30pm GMT), but the final award presentation was delayed until midnight (20:00 GMT). Naqvi was able to see on TV footage and talk to match officials.
After the presentation began and the stage was set, the official removed the Asia Cup Champions Trophy from Raised Dais without explanation.
Indian players Kuldeep Yadav, Abhishek Sharma and Tilak Varma have received individual awards from other high-ranking officials on stage during their presentations. Naqvi was on stage when this happened, but the Indian player did not recognize the ACC Chief and the Pakistani minister.
Pakistan’s captain Salman Aga has collected runner-up checks from NAQVI.
“I’ve been informed by the Asian Cricket Council that the Indian cricket team will not collect awards tonight,” said Simon Dur, a former cricketer from New Zealand, who gave a post-match presentation.
Doull then released the conclusions of the post-match presentation ceremony.
The Indian team then celebrated by pretending to hold the trophy.
Officials have not confirmed the current location of the trophy, but are usually held alongside the tournament organizer until handed over to the winner. Until late on Sunday, the Indian team had not received it.
“I think this is one thing I’ve never seen since I started playing cricket. I started following cricket. The champion team was rejected for trophies and they were hard-earned. “We feel it deserves it. I can’t say anything more. I put it all together really well.”
Yadav added that it was a team decision to reject the trophy, “No one has been told to do it.”
What is the context?
India and Pakistan have been struggling for years. However, they plummeted even further on April 22nd after gunmen killed 26 men during an attack on Pahargam, a tourism site in Kashmir, controlled by India.
The Resistance Front (TRF), an armed group calling for Kashmir’s independence, has argued for responsibility for the attack. India claims that the TRF is a branch of Rashkar e Tayba (let), an armed group based in Pakistan.
After the attack, the two countries reduced diplomatic relations and India stopped participating in the Induswaters Treaty.
On May 7, India launched multiple missile attacks on Pakistan and Pakistan-controlled Kashmir sites with what they called Operation Sindore. India said it had hit nine sites in Pakistan.
On May 10, Pakistan targeted at least six Indian military locations, killing at least five Indians, and launched Operation Bunyan Marsoos, according to Indian authorities.
On the same day, both sides reached a ceasefire agreement announced by US President Donald Trump.
Are the tensions in cricket rising as well?
Yes, the hostilities on Sunday after the match were the pinnacle of weeks of tension that clouded the Asian Cup.
In India, many politicians and influential public figures, including those who support Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Hindu majority Bharatiya Janata Party government, have called on the national team to boycott the match against Pakistan.
The Pro-Modi Television channel has criticized the BCCI, which has been closely in line with policies with the Indian government in recent years to participate in the Asian Cup with Pakistan. The BCCI said India has refused to play bilateral tournaments with Pakistan, but has followed the government’s instructions to refuse to participate in multinational contests, including matches against Pakistan at those events.
In the end, India not only played in the Asian Cup, but also played against Pakistan in three matches.
India won all three games, including the Finals, but the player refused to shake hands with the Pakistani team. This is a move criticized by Pakistan.
After the first match on September 14th, Indian Captain Yadav sparked a conflict during his speech, dedicated his victory to the Indian army. “We support the victims of the family of the Pahargam terrorist attacks. We express solidarity and we want to dedicate our victory to all the troops who have shown a lot of courage,” Yadav said in a post-match presentation.
Meanwhile, Pakistani pacer Harris Rauf responded to an Indian audience signaling 6-0 with their hands during the match, gestures of the aircraft down. India has admitted that Pakistan has shot down an unspecified number of Indian jets.
After the second match between Pakistan and India on September 21, Pakistani opener Sabzadafahan reached 50 runs. To celebrate, he hugged the bat like a machine gun and pretended to be fired, a gesture that was upset by many Indian fans. In the Pahargam attack, the gunman asked tourists if they were Muslims and then shot non-Muslims.
On Sunday, Farhan reached 50 runs again, but this time he quietly celebrated his milestone.
India is also questioning NAQVI’s actions during the tournament. He is expected to become neutral as ACC Chief, but he is also the PCB boss. He posted an X when the Indian team refused to shake hands after the first match. “I am totally disappointed to witness today’s lack of sportsmanship. To drag politics into the game is truly against the spirit of sports.
In another post on September 15th, Naqvi wrote: “Nothing is more important than the honor and fame of my country,” he added a Pakistani flag emoji at the end.
What did the Pakistani leaders say about the tensions in the Asian Cup?
India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi wrote in a post on X on Sunday after the match:
Citing Modi’s post, Nakbi responded: “If war is a measure of your pride, history already records your humiliating defeat at the hands of Pakistan. The cricket match cannot rewrite that truth.
It wasn’t always the case.
Was cricket not a bridge between India and Pakistan?
Certainly, despite the tensions, Pakistani and Indian leaders used cricket as a diplomatic tool decades ago to ease tensions, create public environments that favor discussions, and create environments of political interaction.
The idea of ”cricket diplomacy” was popularized by Pakistan’s President Mohammadziaulhak, who ruled the country from 1978 to 1988.
In February 1987, Zia-ul-Haq visited India to watch test matches, but tensions over Kashmir were at its peak after India gathered troops along the conflict border.
Twelve years later, in early 1999, India held the Pakistan Cricket Team in its first bilateral test series in 10 years. After Pakistan got nervous and close-fought match in Chennai in January, the player rapped on standing ovations from Indian fans around the stadium, highlighting how cricket understood their public diplomacy role.
Between 2003 and 2008, cricket diplomacy reached its peak, with India and Pakistan hosting opponents in two Test series each. In April 2005, Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf went to India to attend consultations with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. The two leaders took part in a cricket match between the teams.
In March 2011, Singh invited Pakistan’s Prime Minister Yusafrazagirani to watch the semi-finals of the World Cup between India and Pakistan. Girani accepted the invitation and visited India.
Was India’s rejection surprising?
In many ways, Sunday’s events were predictable, experts say. Organizers have announced that NAQVI will hand over the winner’s trophy as ACC chief.
India’s response wasn’t surprising, analysts say.
“It’s often said that international politics and sports should remain separate, but in reality, this is easier than they say,” said Mathew John Moolakkattu, a researcher whose PhD degree from Amrita Vishwa Vidyapetham University in Coimbatore, India, explored the diplomacy of cricket.
“Given the ongoing tensions between India and Pakistan, it was probably inevitable that these stocks would surface in arenas that tie the two countries together, such as cricket.”
Moolakkattu pointed out how Indian team captain Yadav announced that the entire match fee would be donated to the Indian Army.
“The Indian team has made it clear from NAQVI that they will not do so due to underlying tensions and unresolved issues between the two countries while still being proud to accept the trophy,” he said.
India’s stance reflects the broader intention of distanced himself from Pakistan in all aspects, including trade, politics, borders, and sports. Such diplomatic and symbolic gestures will likely last until the Indian government believes Pakistan is taking critical steps to end allegations of support for global “terrorism,” Moolakkattu said. Pakistan rejects allegations of support for “terrorism” that crosses India’s borders.
Still, Moolakkattu said the way the Asian Cup was concluded was a way to “harm down the positive diplomatic outcomes that could have come out of the tournament.”
