Paul Shoals claims Manchester United committed a “criminal crime” in the transfer window this summer.
United lost 3-0 to Manchester City on Sunday, meaning they only won one of the five opening games of the season.
Amorim Sack Chat has increased several notches after his latest defeat amid the Portuguese boss claims that he is “losing the dressing room” because the Portuguese boss “is making senior players irritated” over his failed philosophy and system.
However, he again nailed his colour to the 3-4-3 mast when asked about his disgust for trying to fine-tune his formation to suit his players, not to move.
“I won’t change philosophy,” Amorim said. “If they (the unified hierarchy) want to change that, you change guys.
“I’m not going to change philosophy. I play my way until I want to change. Everyone, I understand that (question).
“I understand everything. It’s normal (if the fans are losing faith), but I don’t accept that we’re not getting better.
“My message is that I do everything. I give everything. It’s not my decision, it’s the rest. I’ll do my best. I’m suffering more than (fans).’
Details of the future of Ruben Amorim from the F365
👉Man Utd: Amorim Sack may be imminent as new Romano updates reveal tips for Ineos verdict
👉Amorim bags get closer as man utd moves into action after derby molling
man utd takes “incredible” Reuben Amorim Sack Stance after “lost puppy” attitude in Man City
And the Shoals suggested that the United boss was hampered by the “quality” of his rank, particularly the lack of a proper midfielder and top goalkeeper.
“I don’t think there’s quality,” he told BBC Radio 5 Live’s Monday Night Club.
“Any of the four or five they have (midway) – Casemilo, Bruno (Fernandez), (Cobby) Mine – it doesn’t seem to work out any combination he thinks he’s going to try.
“That’s a big problem. I thought all summer, the absolute priority was a midfield player in the centre and control.
“The goalkeepers were (and) a big problem. Did they really need to get to the Grimsby game?
“If Manchester United weren’t in Gianluigi Donnaruma’s market when he became available, it would be a criminal offence.
“The employers went to buy it before. That needed to be addressed, but did you need three of them?
