Washington (AP) – Teachers, social workers, nurses and other civil servants will be separated from popularity Student Loan Cancellation Program If the Trump administration determines that an employer is engaged in the activity for “substantially illegal purposes” under a new federal proposal announced Friday.
The education sector has announced plans to target and review nonprofits or government agencies working with immigrants and transgender youth. Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program. Opponents fear that new policies will turn the benefits of loan forgiveness into tools of political retaliation.
The proposal gives the Education Secretary the final decision when determining whether a group or agency should be excluded from the program. This was created by Congress in 2007 and encourages more university graduates to enter the low-wage public services field. The proposals say illegal activities include child trafficking or “chemical castration,” illegal immigration and support of foreign terrorist organizations. “Chemocautery” is defined as the use of hormone therapy or drugs that delay puberty – Gender maintenance care It is common among transgender children and teens.
President Donald Trump I ordered a change In March, the loan forgiveness program said it would lead taxpayer money to “activist organisations,” threaten national security and not serve the public.
The public is given 30 days to consider the proposal before finalizing it. The changes will take effect in July 2026.
Under current rules, government officials and many nonprofit workers can cancel federal student loans after making a 10-year payment. The program is open to government workers, including teachers, firefighters and public hospital employees, along with nonprofits focused on specific areas.
The new proposal excludes employees of organizations related to activities deemed illegal. The education sector predicts that organizations with fewer than 10 employees will be considered ineligible for the year. The proposal does not expect a “significant reduction” in the proportion of borrowers who are allowed to be forgiven under the program.
However, agents acknowledge that not all industries are affected equally. Schools, universities, healthcare providers, social workers and legal services organizations are most likely to put their qualifications at risk, the department writes.
It gave no more details about what “illegal” behaviors were being carried out by groups that could ban the program. However, the proposal suggests gender-affirming care. 27 says it bans it It’ll be enough.
If a state or federal court governs rules against an employer, it could lead to expulsion from the program. Or if the employer is involved in a legal settlement that involves recognition of fraud.
However, even without legal recognition, the Education Secretary can independently decide that the organization should be evicted. Secretary A legal standard known as “estech prevailing” can be used to determine whether an organization has participated in illegal activities. This means that the accusation is likely to be true.
If an organization is banned from the program, future loan payments for workers will no longer be counted for cancellations. They need to find work to continue to advance towards forgiveness with another eligible employer. The ban from the education sector will last for 10 years or until employers complete a “corrective action plan” approved by the Secretary.
Critics have denounced the proposal as an illegal attempt to weaponize student loan cancellations. Christine McGuire, CEO of Young Inbonbulls, a nonprofit advocate for loan forgiveness, called it a political stunt designed to disrupt borrowers.
“By using a distorted and very broad definition of “illegal conduct,” the Trump administration is misusing its student loan system to attack political enemies,” McGuire said in a statement.
The Education Department sketched plans for the overhaul during the federal rulesmaking process that began in June. The agency gathered a panel of experts to help solve the details. This is a process known as negotiated rule creation. However, the panel failed to reach consensus, which was released to allow the department to advance its own design proposal.
The proposal, released Friday, included several changes to facilitate the concerns raised by the panel of experts. Some were worried that the department would ban the organisation solely to support transgender rights, even if they were not directly involved in gender-affirming care. The new proposal makes it clear that secretaries will not expel the organization to exercise their First Amendment rights.
___
Associated Press Education Compensation receives financial support from several private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find the AP standard For charity, list of ap.org supporters and funded compensation areas.
